Napoleons Kriege: March of the Eagles
Sammlung
Du musst angemeldet sein
Über das Spiel
Dieser Beitrag hat noch keine Einträge.
Systemanforderungen
Noch haben wir keine Systemanforderungen für dieses Spiel eintragen können oder es sind noch keine bekannt.
Steam Nutzer-Reviews
Empfohlen
1158 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 26.06.16 16:25
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
3675 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 13.10.15 15:45
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
3909 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 28.12.14 17:01
Die vielen verschiedenen Taktiken und Anführer verleihen dem Spiel eine Strategische Tiefe, die viele andere Titel nicht ereichen.
Wer sich hier jedoch auf einen Aufbau/Diplomatie/Kampftitel im Stil von Crusader KIngs 2 oder Europa Universalis freut, wird entäuscht. Außer Kämpfen und Erobern bietet das Spiel wenig. Gerade im Diplomatiebereich hätte mehr vorhanden sein können.
Trotzallem: Für 5-10 Euro sollten Strategiefans zuschlagen. 20 Euro auf Steam finde ist ein bisschen zu viel. Voralem weil das Spiel nach 1 mal durchspielen nicht mehr so motieverend ist. Da es doch immer das gleiche ist.
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
3541 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 23.04.14 18:00
Weiterlesen
Nicht Empfohlen
272 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 22.03.14 19:07
Wenn man in überzahl ist (mind. 5-6 Tausend) gewinnt man fasst immer. Man kann nur ein paar Länder wirklich spielen ohne Marionette oder mit höchstens 10.000 Männern(z.B. England,Frankreich,Preußen,Österreich,Russland...).
Naja das ist meine Meinung zu dem Spiel, entweder ihr teilt sie oder teilt sie nicht;).
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
651 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 03.01.22 21:38
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
94 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 19.09.21 05:16
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
102 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 21.04.21 15:00
i would recommend it to people who want to get into Paradox Games but are for the moment too overwhelmed by the depth of EU4 or VIC2.
I bought the game on sale and with a ratio of 1€ per hour i can say that it was worth it
Hoping for MoTE 2
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
523 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 10.03.21 23:46
On the cons side it is probably one of my least favourite games featuring the napoleonic wars because all but the military side is so limited to non-existent. I recall Empire total war (starts before the napoleonic wars though), Napoleon total war, Cossacks 2 and Imperial Glory and I would rate all of them above March of the Eagles. I only recommend March of the Eagles if you want to see the complex Paradoxian military management in the napoleonic era. All others are probably better off with the other strategy titles mentioned above.
Weiterlesen
Nicht Empfohlen
1102 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 04.03.21 11:28
Weiterlesen
Nicht Empfohlen
11427 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 12.02.21 02:09
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
67 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 27.11.20 15:25
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
582 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 14.09.20 15:34
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
230 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 03.09.20 11:04
I *am* a Napoleon enthusiast, so, let's just say it's nice to see this era get more interest. I'm sorry Isorrow doesn't like it, I think it's a great game honestly.
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
1341 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 30.04.20 10:07
Superficial Stuff:
Music: I really like the music here. While it doesnt have many tracks, the few it does have are really great. They fit very well with the game, and the battle tracks are very, very good. Give the OST a listen on YouTube, if you like the style, you wont be disappointed, 8/10
grafix: On par with other games Paradox makes. Definitely not bad, but not great either. They serve the purpose they should be serving, and they do that job well. 6.5/10
Actually Important Stuff
Gameplay: VERY fast paced. If you like that sort of thing, this is the game for you. Unless youre playing as a smaller country, you will likely be at war for the majority of the game. Think HoI4, but World War II starts in August 1936. This game is no where near as in depth as EU4, but it wasnt designed to be, and doesnt try to be something it isnt. It is a war game, no two ways about it, 100% war focused. It can get confusing at times, there are a million different brigades you can make, but a lot are virtually identical to eachother, and so can get ignored. The ideas system that was in previous games is expanded and changed to something more like EU4's system, and its in a transitional period. I think EU4's idea system is better, but overall it does serve the purpose its supposed to serve, i.e. allowing nations to specialise in certain things, and giving nations extra flavour. The game is not for everyone, if you like fast paced, basically battle royale style games, then this game is great. If not, id suggest a different title. I enjoyed what ive played though. 7/10 for me, if HOI4 is your favourite game, then its probably around an 8, if your favourite is ck2, then probably a 3 or 4
Stability: Note I am playing on a shitty laptop from like 10 years ago, so you will likely have a better experience than me, but this is what i experienced. This game runs fine, a couple serious frame drops, but generally pretty smooth, and i get good speeds when at speed 5 (not something i can normally say, my EU4 speed 5 is probably your speed 3). I have had a few random crashes though, so be aware of that. If you care about your game, save fairly regularly. 6/10
Overall: Not nearly as bad as the iSorrow bandwagon would have you believe. There is definitely something to be enjoyed here. 7/10
TL;DR Good music, good enough graphics, fast paced, HOI4 x10 style gameplay, and i had a few random crashes. Give this game a try if its on sale.
Weiterlesen
Empfohlen
2684 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 04.03.14 18:47
When I bought the game I was a complete Paradox Interactive noob but I always liked the idea of their truly-grand strategy games. However, having played the demos for Europa Universalis III and Hearts of Iron II, I was convinced I would never be able to get my head around the complexities of Paradox's games. This all changed with March of the Eagles. The era in which the game is set is right up my street and the scale of the campaign map was like nothing I'd experienced before ('scale' is a relative term here).
People familiar with strategy games will be fimiliar with the basic concepts here. You destroy your enemies and take their land, simple. However, in MotE the immediate gains (land) you make are much smaller than those in other games such as the Total War series. This may sound boring to some but I assure you the opposite is true. Because you have to fight harder for every inch, when you eventually destroy a nation it is all the more satisfying.
Every nations on the map is playable from launch (no DLC is a rarity these days) which adds replayability to the game. I had the most fun playing as a lesser nations and working the larger powers against each other. Personally I recommend one of the Italian nations.
Educational and fun!?!?!
What suprised me is what you learn while playing this game! If history/national geography interests you then this game is great. I can now name a lot of lesser Germanic/Burgundian nations such as Nassau and Hessen which I didn't know once existed. There are also event pop ups which add little to gameplay but provide educational fun, such as I never knew that Napoleon named his brother the King of The Netherlands. Fun fact!
Diplomacy:
The diplomacy element and associated AI is not the greatest in any game ever to be honest but it does the job perfectly well. There is a 'coalition' mechanic in this game which is a unique concept as far as I am concerned. This basically means that you and a bunch of other nations rally behind a super-power (Prussia, Austria, Russia, Ottomans, French or British [and Spain, but not really]) to defeat another super-power which results in an unbreakable alliance. This is a nice idea and historically relevent and probably the best feature in the game.
Combat/War:
Let's be honest. You auto-resolve most of the battles when playing Total War and that's why you're here.
Basically the meat and potatoes of the game. If you're not planning on going to war there is not much point in playing the game. There are no live battlefield engagements in the style of Total War or Age of Empires but frankly they are not needed. While nine times out of ten combat boils down to who has more men, there are still other elements that effect the outcome in subtle ways. There are a variety of units avaliable to build but they are essentially pictures which represent statistics. But specific army composition is not necessarily what the game is about for me (though the right balance helps). For me it is not the who, but the where and when.... and also who a bit. Having the right amount of men in the right place at the right time is how you are going to win, not by numbers and blitzkrieg tactics. Also, with the exception of Russia and the Ottomans, you are not going to survive alone. You need friends. When you build an epic alliance as Britain with Naples, Prussia, Bavaria and Piemonte against the French this is where the game shines. It's even more fun to watch all those nations instantly turn against you for their personal gain as soon as the war is over. In this respect the game is extremely Machiavellian, and I love it!
The combat is further complicated by the need to balance resources such as money and manpower. Compared to other Paradox games this level of resource management is childs play, but it is still on a par with other conventional RTSs.
Famous historical characters such as Horatio Nelson and Napoleon make cameos which is a nice touch. They come with combat bonuses and can lead you armies/navies.
Graphics:
Acceptable. There is not a lot to be said here as the game essentially consists of a map and a few character models. It looks nice, don't get me wrong, but it is what it is. If you're going to be persuaded either way by graphics for a game like this you're probably in the wrong place. Be warned, there are a lot of menus but that is fine. You find your way pretty quickly.
Sound/Music:
The sound effects are passable to the point of being simply passive. Again, there is not much to report. Music on the other hand is where Paradox always delivers and this game is no different. It feels thematic but also extremely epic. The music adds further grandeur to the game which may not exist otherwise.
Conclusion:
The way Steam works the chances are this game will come up in a Steam sale soon enough. If it drops below £10 ($13ish) and it sounds like it might be your thing just get it and blame me if you're disappointed. I doubt you will be. If you want to get into Paradox grand strategies but don't know where to start then this is the one for you! It's simple enough to pick up easily but deep enough not to be considered a glorified tutorial for the other games, yet it introduces you to the essentials of Paradox grand strategies. For me it was a gate way drug and now Paradox is one of my all time favourite game developers.
The downside. To be brutally honest after playing Crusader Kings II and Victoria II, among others, I don't see why a seasoned Paradox fan would buy this if they don't already own it. It brings nothing new to the grand strategy table. It was so good for me because it was my first expericence with the genre but if you know the genre already then there is little for you here. It's good, yes. But there are other Paradox games which are better (the aforementioned Crusader Kings II is my favourite so far).
Arbitrary numbers
For the uninitiated Paradox virgin: 8.5/10 (buy at any price)
For the Paradox veteran: 6.5/10 (buy at a reduced price)
Weiterlesen
Nicht Empfohlen
1134 Std. insgesamt
Verfasst: 16.12.13 21:50
I really hope they take another shot at the era but next time take the time to design or better modify the game engine to better reflect the uniqueness of the simulation.
Weiterlesen
Release:01.03.2013
Genre:
Strategie
Entwickler:
Paradox Interactive
Vertrieb:
Paradox Interactive
Engine:keine Infos
Kopierschutz:keine Infos
Franchise:keine Infos
Einzelspieler
Mehrspieler
Koop
Kein Prisoner hat oder wartet auf das Spiel